Thursday, October 6, 2011
Folks I went to David Chen piece to post a comment because Elligon’s piece offered no chance to comment. The piece he wrote isn’t worth reading so I posted my response here...
September 6 piece by John Elligon gives readers no opportunity to comment so I return here. First to comment on this piece....there is no doubt that Mike Bloomberg perjured himself on the stand with his testimony about not knowing Haggerty when it can be proven he met with Haggerty many times and attended Haggerty’s father’s funeral. Bloomberg also perjured himself on term limits and Goldsmith and Vance won’t prosecute him. Immunity doesn’t protect against perjury but expect no action taken. Re: Connelly and today’s piece where no comments are allowed...Connelly, Bloomberg and Haggerty all knew there is no way Haggerty could have spent 1.1 million in 24 hours. Bloomberg was funneling money to Haggerty they way he did the prior election and essentially was saying keep the change. This was simple math just like CityTime, SAIC and sub-contractors so we learn Mike treats tax payer money like his own personal fortune and the People of New York receive sub-zero trickle down a term I made up.